Charlotte in Color!

Following the success of “What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?,” Joan Crawford and Bette Davis were to be reteamed in another campy horror film, “Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte.” This time, the two screen legends would be switching role types: Joan would play the evil backstabbing Miram and Bette the sympathetic heroine, Charlotte. Well, as much of a sympathetic heroine as Bette could play at this point in her career. As she did in “Baby Jane,” Bette went over the top in her performance, layering on the hysterics. Unfortunately, Crawford was replaced by Olivia DeHavilland, so we never got to see how the dynamic duo would have fared when the tables were turned. “Charlotte” was filmed in black and white, just like its predecessor. These two rare color shots of Bette Davis were taken on set of the film in June 1964.

Released in December 1964, the film garnered seven Oscar nominations but didn’t win in any of those categories. Would Joan have been nominated? That would surely have made her feud with Davis far worse! Here’s a previously posted shot of Joan with costar Joseph Cotten and director and producer Robert Aldrich during the time she was involved in the production:

See more vintage Movie and TV photos at my main website.

Joan Gets Hushed

Most classic movie buffs are aware of the movie "Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?" and the legendary feud that existed between its two stars, Joan Crawford and Bette Davis. A lesser known fact is that the two actresses were scheduled to do a follow-up gothic horror movie, "Hush, Hush, Sweet Charlotte."

Although "Baby Jane" went relatively smoothly, the tensions that simmered during that shoot finally erupted once rehearsals and filming started on "Charlotte."

On the last day of location shooting in Louisiana, the cast and crew packed up and left town without alerting Joan, who'd finished her scenes and fallen asleep in her trailer while waiting to see if she was needed for additional shots. Needless to say, Joan was pissed off and attempted to quit the picture, but discovered she was legally bound to continue. Claiming illness, Joan checked into Cedars Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, and temporarily had production halted on the picture.

On July 20, Joan returned to work. Here's a publicity shot and accompanying blurb that went out two days later:



Joan Crawford in her first scene 7/22 before the camera since her illness which held up production of "Hush…Hush, Sweet Charlotte" at 20th Century-Fox Studios is shown doing scene with co-star Joseph Cotton as producer-director Robert Aldrich watches in background next to camera.

Director Aldrich felt that Joan was faking, and after many back and forth discussions between insurance companies, studio execs, and Joan herself, it was decided to replace her. Vivien Leigh was one of the choices; her hilarious response to the request was this: “No, thank you. I can just about stand looking at Joan Crawford's face at six o'clock in the morning, but not Bette Davis.”

A month later, it was announced that Olivia DeHavilland would replace Joan.

In later years, costar Joseph Cotten stood up for Crawford, stating that Davis’ treatment of Joan was not very professional at all. Although the picture did great box office, it is definitely not as memorable as “Baby Jane.” It would have been interesting seeing Joan have the upper-hand over Bette in this picture. It might have caused Bette to tone down her over-the-top performance which detracts from the movie. In the detailed view below, note Aldrich prominently holding a bottle of Coke for the cameras. Surely he was aware of Joan’s relationship with Pepsi; this brazen move shows that he was extremely unaware or that he wanted her to leave the production to pacify Bette. 



Sharp-eyed viewers can see Crawford's face is still visible in the finished movie during a few long-shots that survived from her work in Louisiana.

See more classic movie photos on my Classic Movie web page.